Maybe We’re Not All Bad

This is a post for men. This is not a post for women. If you are a woman, I respectfully request that you stop reading immediately. I’m fixing to explain a couple of things, and I certainly don’t want to fall into the sin of mansplaining. So skedaddle, ladies.

That includes you in the back. Sorry ma’am. Dudes only.

David Foster Wallace headshot 2006

Okay guys, here’s the thing. I’ve been thinking about this Deirdre Coyle essay, in which she condescends to read one of David Foster Wallace’s lesser works, after years of avoiding him because every man who recommends him to her is, well, an asshole. As I noted in my last post, she commences her essay with a nifty ad hominem non sequitur, noting that one of her sexual partners forced cocaine into her during the act. Get it? This is the kind of guy who likes Wallace.

Coyle’s essay is unabashedly ill-informed and small-minded and mean, but it’s getting a lot of appreciative remarks from women who claim similar experiences (not the drug assaults, but haranguing pro-DFW exhortations from dirtball patriarchy bros).

First, let’s be clear. Guys who are mean are mean guys. We do not like mean guys, and we don’t want to be mean guys. And the guy who forced cocaine into Coyle should be in jail. Hopefully she called the police, so that no other young woman receives a similar victimization at his hands, or worse.

But we can affirm Coyle’s (and her readers’) experiences without embracing bad logic, right? I mean, that’s allowed, isn’t it?

What I mean is that I know decent men (and women!) who believe Wallace was an insightful, compassionate, brilliant writer. He’s not everyone’s cup of tea, to be sure, but it’s hard to understand the notion that he’s more likely to attract misogynists than Philip Roth, say, or Charles Bukowski.

So, a conjecture. A hypothesis. A possibility. Maybe it’s not the case that intellectual assholes are disproportionately attracted to Wallace. Maybe it’s the case that women who’ve had these unsavory experiences are disproportionately surrounded by intellectual assholes.

Think about it. Deirdre Coyle lives in New York City. Her affirmers live in that city and in similar urban intellectual bastions—places like Berkeley, Middlebury, and Seattle. My apologies to the many good people living in intellectual communities, but let’s be honest. You’re carrying more assholes per capita than Wichita, Kansas.

Here’s a Venn diagram to illustrate my point.1

David Foster Wallace-Asshole nexus

 

Maybe that hatch-marked field of Wallace-admiring assholes seems so prevalent, in other words, not because most Wallace-admirers suck, but because you’re mingling in the wrong part of the circle.

Of course I may have my proportions off. Maybe only half the men eligible to date intelligent, literary New York City women are assholes. Maybe 99 percent of them are. Maybe 90 percent of David Foster Wallace lovers are heterosexual, literary males living in big cities. Heck, maybe 100 percent of us are indeed assholes.2

It’s a conjecture, like I said, but so is the conclusion, drawn from the limited experiences available to someone living in a precious, urban, liberal literary bubble, that the jackwagons infesting big-city wine bars and poetry readings are representative of most men.

Now guys, whether you were already thinking the same thing, or you have just had your world Venn-rocked, I ask you to keep this to yourselves. I mean, the only thing worse than a suspected egotistical misogynist is a man who insists that he is not an egotistical misogynist. We doth protest too much and all that.

And while you’re keeping mum, maybe lay off the book recommendations. I mean, read the comments below Coyle’s essay. We are not helping ourselves. And this is basic Courtship and Courtesy 101. Give some genuine interest to her interests before you try to interest her in your interests. Or to put it more succinctly: Be a gentleman.

Okay. Good talk.

  1. So, I had a really crappy and weird-looking diagram here, but my friend Kristen Rudd took pity on me and drew a much better one. If you really like it you should tell her thank you.
  2. I’m 95 percent certain that I, personally, am an asshole at least 50 percent of the time.

Comments

  1. Jennifer

    I’m a woman, but I read this anyway, not least because you told me not to. And I think you’re right. For what it’s worth, I only know two other people who have read Infinite Jest: a woman who hated it and a man who loved it. Both are brilliant and neither is an asshole more than half the time, at least not to my knowledge. But you’re also right that pushing the recommendation on potential romantic partners is guaranteed to be counter-productive.

  2. Post
    Author
    Woodlief

    Thanks Jennifer. I think it has a definite appeal to intellectuals, and perhaps especially to male intellectuals, for reasons that presently elude me but which are perhaps related to the reasons all my female friends hate “What About Bob” and all my male friends hate “Titanic” (except for the ship-sinking part), but I really would love to hear from women with diverse friendship networks to know whether Coyle’s observation can be substantiated past intellectual urban circles.

  3. Anonymous Coward

    More plausible theory? People are assholes.
    It’s a simpler Venn diagram to draw too.

Comments are closed.